![]() Let’s clarify which of the two is the proper word. Debord has described the Spectacle as "the autocratic reign of the market economy which had acceded to an irresponsible sovereignty, and the totality of new techniques of government which accompanied this reign.Are you curious about the difference between barnacle and spectacles? These two words may seem like they have nothing in common, but in reality, they share a common trait – they are both nouns with distinct meanings. The work of French Marxist thinker Guy Debord is perhaps the best-known example of this critical analysis see his The Society of the Spectacle (1967). Recently the word has been associated with the many ways in which a capitalist structure is purported to create play-like celebrations of its products and leisure time consumption. Spectacle can also refer to a society that critics describe as dominated by electronic media, consumption, and surveillance, reducing citizens to spectators by political neutralization. ( Jonathan Crary: 2005) Current academic theories of spectacle "highlight how the productive forces of marketing, often associated with media and Internet proliferation, create symbolic forms of practice that are emblematic of everyday situations." Within industrial and post-industrial cultural and state formations, spectacle has been appropriated to describe appearances that are purported to be simultaneously enticing, deceptive, distracting and superficial. It astonished people unaccustomed to the illusion created by moving images.įor the notion of the spectacle in critical theory, see Spectacle (critical theory). The camera was in front of the train, and the train "came" directly at the viewer. Louis Lumière filmed a train pulling into a station in 1895 ( L'Arrivée d'un train en gare de La Ciotat). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |